How one simple question in a weight-loss clinic uncovered a hidden link between childhood adversity, stress, and lifelong health.
What Are ACEs?
Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are stressful or traumatic events that happen before the age of 18 — such as abuse, neglect, or growing up in a household with mental illness, substance use, or domestic violence. These early hardships can shape brain development, stress responses, and lifelong health in ways we’re still learning to fully understand.
Where the ACE Study Began
The original Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study didn’t start as a trauma project at all—it began with a puzzle in an obesity clinic in California in the mid-1990s. Dr. Vincent Felitti, a physician at Kaiser Permanente, was perplexed: many patients who successfully lost weight suddenly dropped out or regained it all.
When he dug deeper, a surprising pattern emerged. Patient after patient shared quiet stories of childhood abuse, neglect, or chaotic family environments—painful experiences they had rarely, if ever, discussed. It became clear that for some, the extra weight served as emotional armor, providing protection and buffering them against a world that had once felt unsafe.
This insight invites a deeper question for all of us to consider: What if a body stuck in survival mode for years can quietly drive weight gain? Many of us now hear this called “cortisol belly” — the idea that long-term stress floods the body with cortisol, storing fat around the belly, fueling inflammation, and keeping us locked in high alert, even when the danger has long passed.
Felitti teamed up with Dr. Robert Anda from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, launching the groundbreaking ACE Study between 1995 and 1997. They surveyed more than 17,000 adults, asking detailed questions about childhood experiences of abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction. By linking these responses to medical records, they confirmed a powerful relationship: higher ACE scores meant significantly increased risks for depression, heart disease, addiction, and, notably, struggles with weight linked to chronic stress.
The ACE Study fundamentally shifted how we understand trauma’s lasting effects. Rather than viewing childhood adversity as distant, forgotten wounds, the study illuminated them as critical, ongoing drivers of mental and physical health—highlighting the invisible burden the body carries long after childhood ends.
What It Studied
In 2015, the RYSE Center (USA)— a youth-led community hub in Richmond, California — set out to expand how we think about ACEs. They recognised that the original ACE Study focused mostly on family-level harm, but didn’t fully capture the broader environments that shape young people’s stress and safety.
The RYSE study used a socio-ecological model — which means it looked at the layers that affect a young person’s life, from the family to the neighbourhood, to schools, to bigger systems like poverty and racism. They paid special attention to historical trauma — for example, the impact of colonisation and generational discrimination on families and communities of colour.
Why It Matters
This study reminds us that childhood stress is not only about what happens inside the home — it’s also shaped by what happens around it. Young people living in unsafe neighbourhoods, or dealing with discrimination and lack of opportunity, may face chronic stress even if their home life is loving and supportive.
What this means in practice:
Stress and trauma often run deeper than one family — they’re shaped by neighbourhoods, schools, and histories that echo across generations.
Supporting young people means noticing these layers — not just asking what happened at home, but what’s happening around them.
Real healing is bigger than individual therapy — it grows stronger when communities feel safe, trusted, and supported to break old cycles.
Key insight from the RYSE Center:
“When we widen the lens, we see that real safety and healing need both personal support and social change.”
In the spirit of yoga,
Atmavan Manyate Jagat
— as is the self, so one sees the world — reminds us that healing is not just about what surrounds us, but how we hold and meet it within. Real change honours both: the world outside us, and the patterns inside.
Harm and healing don’t just begin at home — they’re shaped by what surrounds us, too.
By 2017, the Philadelphia ACE Project asked a simple but powerful question: What happens when adversity lives not only behind closed doors, but out in the street, at school, or woven through a neighbourhood?
In many city blocks, young people were navigating daily threats that stacked up alongside family stress — bullying, community violence, racism, unsafe streets, foster care. When these experiences were added to the ACE checklist, the results were hard to ignore: in some parts of Philadelphia, more than 8 out of 10 children carried at least one ACE.
Harm often hides where support is thin.
The Philly project showed something many communities already know: when families live with fewer resources — unstable housing, underfunded schools, fewer safe places to gather — stress can stick around. People in lower socio-economic areas often face more daily risks and fewer buffers, which means ACEs can become chronic conditions, not just one-off events.
But the truth cuts across income lines, too: adversity, neglect, and fear can appear in wealthier households and so-called “safe” places. No one is immune — but some carry heavier loads for longer, simply because their surroundings keep adding to the weight.
Where healing begins.
The Philly ACE Project reminds us that healing isn’t just about fixing what happens at home — it’s about building communities where children feel safe walking to school, neighbours look out for each other, and racism and neglect lose their power to repeat harm.
Key reminder:
“Harm thrives in isolation — healing grows where safety and connection are strong.”
Want to check your own ACEs?
You can view a simple version of the ACE Questionnaire here. This short quiz shows how the original questions explored early experiences — but remember, it’s not a diagnosis, just a starting point for reflection and conversation.
References
Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., Koss, M. P., & Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8
Balistreri, K. S., & Alvira-Hammond, M. (2015). Adverse childhood experiences, family functioning and adolescent health and emotional well-being. Public Health, 132, 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.01.030
(Note: If you’re directly referencing the RYSE Center’s 2015 work, please check the exact citation, as this is a common ACE community expansion reference — you may have an internal report instead, which can be cited as: RYSE Center. (2015). Community Report on Adverse Childhood Experiences. Richmond, CA: RYSE Center.)
Philadelphia ACE Task Force. (2013). Adverse Childhood Experiences in Philadelphia: Data Report. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Safe Families & Health Federation of Philadelphia. Retrieved from https://www.philadelphiaaces.org/sites/default/files/Philadelphia%20ACE%20Report%202013.pdf